Launch Enterprise-Grade Microservices in Days - Get Your Free Boilerplate
The manufacturing industry, like every other industry, is under pressure to deliver faster while still maintaining quality and constantly optimizing costs. Once an operational challenge, it quickly becomes a boardroom priority when the bottom line starts to waver.
Our client, a mid-sized manufacturer with multiple plants in the Midwest, was struggling with the same.
Over the last decade, their business grew and so did the number of platforms they used. The problem? The systems, which were originally supposed boost productivity, had started to cause operational inefficiencies. How? Due to multiple ERP and shop-floor systems that didn’t integrate or interact with one another. These disconnected systems caused:
PowerApps enterprise solutions emerged as a way to address these challenges. With Microsoft PowerApps for enterprises, we helped them connect existing systems, reduce manual work, and offered real-time visibility across systems.
Did You Know? A Forrester survey found that PowerApps integration services can help save ~250 hours/year. That's more than 6 weeks of productive time, per employee, per year.
Our client knew that they needed more than just a software upgrade to bring about manufacturing IT cost reductions. They wanted a complete transformation of how their plants operated. For that, we started by understanding their key business goals. Then as a part of our PowerApps consulting services we conducted workshops with plant managers, IT teams, and operations leaders. This helped align the technical solutions with their needs.
Based on the deep dives the key technical goals which had to be achieved were:
Next, we did a thorough technical audit of their existing systems. This helped identify hidden dependencies, data inconsistencies, and user adoption challenges that would arise during custom enterprise application development.
Our client needed a platform that could unify systems, enable innovation, and support integrations. To deliver such a 360-degree solution, we evaluated several tech options.
The high PowerApps ROI for enterprises was the main reason we chose it for this project. Here’s why it stood out:
Important: To ensure PowerApps was viable for this project we also used the PowerApps assessment checklist.
Along with the PowerApps for cost reduction strategy, we also used the following technologies to complete the stack:
Here is a simplified system architecture diagram of our proposed legacy app modernization with PowerApps
With this setup of Power Apps for manufacturing operation, we aimed to set up a robust, scalable, and secure system for our client.
Once the consulting phase defined the roadmap and the technology stack was finalized, we moved into solutioning and turned the strategy into execution.
Below, we’ve explained our solutioning approach to using Power Apps for manufacturing along with core challenges that we faced in each step and how we tackled those.
The client’s data was fragmented across ERPs, Excel sheets, and custom exports. Each plant had its own version of ‘truth.’ Before any modernization could succeed, we had to design a unified data model that standardized core entities such as inventory, suppliers, and production orders, creating the foundation for reliable analytics and system-wide consistency
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Legacy systems stored the same information in different structures. Details were in Excel at one site, a flat-file ERP export at another plant. | We used Azure Data Factory to build ETL pipelines that normalized data formats and performed cleansing, deduplication, and validation. This ensured reporting and analytics weren’t corrupted by inconsistent inputs. |
Real-time communication was mission-critical. Shop-floor scheduling, supplier updates, and inventory changes had to sync instantly across plants. But the client’s legacy systems lacked APIs, making system-to-system communication unreliable. We built an integration layer to serve as the backbone of orchestration. This enabled secure, real-time data flow without replacing legacy assets
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Some legacy systems were built 15+ years ago and had no APIs | We wrapped the legacy processes inside .NET Core microservices that exposed modern REST APIs and gave old systems “new life.” This solved the real-time integration gap and also avoided the high cost of ripping out older systems. |
Once the data and integration layers were stable, the next challenge was usability. Operators and managers needed tools that matched their workflows, not abstract dashboards. We delivered three modular Power Apps for manufacturing that could be quickly adopted by frontline users:
Challenge | Resolution |
---|---|
Shop floors often lacked stable Internet | Leveraging PowerApps’ offline sync features, we built local caching that let users continue work offline and push changes when connectivity returned. |
Digitization solved visibility gaps, but people were still spending hours on repetitive approvals, compliance checks, and supplier updates. To truly unlock efficiency, workflows had to be automated, not just digitized. We introduced automation that embedded business rules directly into processes, eliminating bottlenecks while maintaining compliance
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Some workflows overlapped, leading to duplicate approvals and even “looped” triggers where one action retriggered itself. | To solve this, we built a custom rule engine within the .NET Core layer that validated workflow triggers against business logic before allowing execution. |
Leaders at our client’s organization had long relied on static weekly reports, often outdated by the time they reached the boardroom. The new platform had to deliver live, role-specific insights. For that, we built an analytics layer on Power BI that transformed reporting from reactive to real-time decision-making.
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Early versions overwhelmed users with 20+ KPIs per dashboard. | Through role-specific workshops, we came down to only 5–7 KPIs per role. Plant managers saw operational KPIs like downtime and output; CFOs saw cost savings and supplier efficiency. |
With plants spread across multiple regions and compliance standards, security was non-negotiable. The client needed role-based access that matched a global security baseline. We built a governance model that combined Azure AD authentication with conditional access policies, balancing usability with enterprise-grade protection.
Challenge | Resolution |
---|---|
Plants across different regions operated under varying compliance requirements | By using conditional access policies, we allowed local flexibility while enforcing a consistent global security baseline. This dual approach struck the right balance between governance and usability. |
Rolling out a platform across multiple plants at once was too risky. User resistance, legacy dependencies, and adoption hurdles could derail the initiative. We launched a pilot Power Apps manufacturing integration at one mid-sized plant with 300 employees. We used this rollout as a controlled environment to refine the apps, address resistance, and build momentum before scaling to all sites.
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Resistance to change was real as many floor managers insisted Excel was “good enough.” | Instead of forcing migration, we embedded Excel import/export functionality in the early app versions. Over time, as managers saw the benefits of live dashboards and automated alerts, reliance on Excel naturally reduced. |
After the project, the final outcomes of our Power Apps for manufacturing operation project were:
Especially with Power Apps integration, we were able to ensure the right balance of rapid deployment, integration capability, scalability, and enterprise-grade security for the client’s application modernization goals.
Despite the bumps along the way, the use of Power Apps for modernizing manufacturing operations delivered measurable impact: